Return to previous page browsed
To obtain copies of Office of Inspector General reports, contact
the Assistant Inspector General for Departmental Reviews and Management
Support at:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Inspector General (53B),
810 Vermont Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20420
The report analyzed ICD-9-CM coding and DRG information derived from 98 medical records from 72 VA medical centers. The purpose of this study was to determine the variability of the ICD-9-CM coding.
Based on this study, OHI concluded that the coding of the primary and secondary diagnoses varied widely. The implications of this variability has to be considered when assessing the validity of health services research, health care program planning, quality assurance, utilization review, and resource allocation for VA Medical Centers based on ICD-9-CM codes or DRG information.
While OHI was not evaluating the coding "error rate" in this study, the coding variability observed in the study was comparable to error rates noted in earlier Institute of Medicine (IOM) studies. We found a 60.6 percent agreement in the primary diagnosis code among the original coders and our expert coder. The IOM studies documented a 65.2 percent agreement on the principal diagnosis code, in 1977, and a 63.4 percent agreement on the principal diagnosis code of the records analyzed in 1980. Thus, in all three studies there was approximately a 2/3's agreement in the coding of the medical record.
Even among the expert coders, there was a 19 percent disagreement on the primary diagnosis code. Since our expert coders were highly qualified, this high rate of disagreement caused OHI to question the reliability of the selection of the primary diagnosis and, thus, the accuracy of coded information.
Return to previous page browsed
If the JavaScript link above does not work on your browser, use your browser's "back" button to return to the VAOIG web page you came from.