Citation Nr: 0820657 Decision Date: 06/24/08 Archive Date: 06/30/08 DOCKET NO. 06-26 749 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Roanoke, Virginia THE ISSUE Entitlement to service connection for sleep apnea. ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD A. D. Jackson, Counsel INTRODUCTION The veteran had active military service from June 2001 to June 2005. This matter came before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal of a January 2006 rating decision of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) in Jackson, Mississippi. The case has been transferred to the RO in Roanoke, Virginia. FINDING OF FACT The veteran does not have a current diagnosis of sleep apnea. CONCLUSION OF LAW Sleep apnea was not incurred in service. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 1110, 5107 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.303 (2007). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION Review of the record reveals that all appropriate notice and development has been accomplished. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5100 et seq. Examination has been conducted. Notice as to what evidence is needed, as well as the type of evidence necessary to establish a disability rating and effective date for that disability, has been provided. Letters of August 2005 and April 2006 provided pertinent notice and development information. While the appellant may not have received full notice prior to the initial decision, after sufficient notice was provided the claimant was afforded a meaningful opportunity to participate in the adjudication of the claims, and the claims were readjudicated. The claimant was provided the opportunity to present pertinent evidence and testimony. In sum, there is no evidence of any VA error in notifying or assisting the appellant that reasonably affects the fairness of this adjudication. Entitlement to service connection for sleep apnea In general, service connection may be granted for disability resulting from disease or injury incurred in or aggravated by active military service. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1110. In order to establish service connection for the claimed disability, there must be (1) medical evidence of a current disability; (2) medical, or in certain circumstances, lay evidence of in-service incurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury; and (3) medical evidence of a nexus between the claimed in-service disease or injury and the current disability. See Hickson v. West, 12 Vet. App. 247, 253 (1999). The determination as to whether these requirements are met is based on an analysis of all the evidence of record and the evaluation of its credibility and probative value. Baldwin v. West, 13 Vet. App. 1, 8 (1999). The veteran claims to have sleep apnea. Significantly, however, the current record does not support a conclusion that the veteran has sleep apnea. Without proof of current disability, service connection cannot be granted. See Hunt v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 292, 296 (1991); Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439, 448 (1995); Chelte v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 268, 271 (1997). In this regard, the service medical records relate that he was seen and scheduled for a sleep study in June 2005. A post service VA examination was conducted in December 2006. Diagnostic studies, including polysomnogram were performed. The sleep study was considered normal. The examiner concluded there was no evidence of sleep apnea. In fact, the medical evidence of record does not include any medical statements or opinions that show a diagnosis of sleep apnea or that relate such a disability to military service. Accordingly, the Board concludes that the preponderance of the evidence is against the claim for service connection for sleep apnea. ORDER Service connection for sleep apnea is denied. ____________________________________________ MICHAEL D. LYON Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals Department of Veterans Affairs